как рендерить в luxrender

With the RC4 the average of samples per second was a bit higher. Look at the TotS/s values.

If you take a close look on both images, you will notice that in the render from RC4 we have a bit less of noise. My impression here is that RC4 was able to work with more samples in the thirty minutes of render time than RC5. This can be verified with the screenshots from LuxRender, when the render was stopped.

After 30 minutes of rendering, this is the result I got from LuxRender RC4.

This project was about a visualization of the furniture layout for an interior design project.

For this experiment I`m using the same computer, a dual core with 2GB of RAM and a windows xp with only the basic services running. The computer was left alone rendering for a period of 30 minutes and by the end of the process; we will compare an image created with RC4 and RC5 to check the amount of noise from both renderers. The scene used is from an old project of mine, which was rendered with Indigo Renderer by the time it was still a freeware.

In the past few days a new version of the upcoming 0.6 was released, and now we have a . Along with several bug fixes, this new release was announced with an improvement in the render speed to previous LuxRender 0.6 RC. Since LuxRender works with progressive refinement to generate the images, and render times can be very long depending on the type of scene rendered, any improvement on the performance of the renderer is welcome. But, since a few users on the LuxRender official forums claimed that render times are almost the same with versions RC4 and RC5, I decided to run a test myself to see if the render speed is shorter with RC5.

» » Render speed test with LuxRender 0.6 RC5 for interior design Render speed test with LuxRender 0.6 RC5 for interior design

Render speed test with LuxRender 0.6 RC5 for interior design | Blender 3D Architect